The passive and the by-phrase

I’ve had a few questions about the passive. We went through that maybe a little quickly in class, and a while ago. The main thing to know about the passive is that, in a passive sentence, there is a Pass auxiliary (“be”) which has, as a condition, that the vP in its complement not have a specifier. No Agent. A passive sentence does not have an Agent in the usual way, it is more like an unaccusative verb. So, where John is the Agent and the sandwich is the Theme, in John kicked the sandwich, the passive form can be just The sandwich was kicked, with the Agent removed and Theme “promoted” to become the subject.

When you include the Agent in a by-phrase, you can take this to be a normal PP, just like by the barn would be. Headed by the P by, with a DP complement. Now, a normal PP would be adjoined in the structure either at vP or at TP, depending on what the meaning is. An agentive by-phrase might attach differently; there is a slide on the handout (“Where does the by-phrase attach?” on handout 10a) that provides data suggesting that the by-phrase attaches lower than TP-adverbs and higher than vP-adverbs. The conclusion of this (which was said in class, though not included on the handout itself) is that the by-phrase probably adjoins to PassP, since that’s what there is between TP and vP. I’ve drawn a (schematic) picture below.

Sandwichabuse.jpg

Gerunds

A while back, there was a question in class about DPs that seem to be able to have adverbs in them, like the subject of John’s skillfully baking cakes amused me.

I didn’t really provide a good answer to how to think about these in class, but I realized that this is actually covered in exercise 1 of the DP chapter in the textbook. It requires a little bit of “thinking outside the box” in a way. Without posting the answer (since it is a homework problem), there is a clue about what Adger had in mind in the statement of Task 4.

Next semester’s LX500 B1 (“Topics in syntax”)

In class, I spent a couple of minutes promoting next semester’s course on “current issues in syntax” and in the process showed the current state of the course blog, which has some information about the format, the schedule, and some ideas about what papers we might be looking at. The web address is:

http://ling.bu.edu/blogs/lx500b1s11/

Although the pre-registration for Spring has already happened, take a look anyway just in case it is something you’d like to substitute in, in place of something else you registered for. I think it will be a pretty interesting class, and, moreover, you—the members of this semester’s CASLX522—are really the core of the target audience. Yet there aren’t many people signed up, and the course will be even better for everyone with more people enrolled. And did I mention that I think it will be pretty interesting? I’m rather looking forward to it myself.

HW7: NOT due Thursday, will be reissued

In class today, I canceled Part 1 of Homework #7 because we haven’t really reached the point I’d want to be at for you to do it.

With this blog post, I hereby cancel Homework #7, in its current form, in its entirety.

To clarify: the task asked of you in Part 2 is something that you can do, and if you are left with a big gap in your schedule that would have been occupied with trying to do this part of the homework, feel free to think it through, because most of what you think about will still be relevant when I reissue the homework. However, to the extent that you are asked to draw trees, I think it doesn’t really make any sense to have you doing that now, given that we’re just about to make a change within the structure of the DPs (to include nPs). Rather than have you take the time to draw trees that will immediately be rendered obsolete in certain details, I’ve decided to postpone this part as well.

What I will do, therefore, is re-issue Homework #7 on Thursday, which puts it at pretty much exactly the right time in terms of the point we are at in class with the material. Due to the upcoming Thanksgiving break, the due date will be the Thursday after Thanksgiving, December 2. I will either hand out a revised version on Thursday if I make any changes, or have you update the due date on your existing copy if I determine that no revision is needed.

BUCLD extra credit opportunity, talk suggestions

I’ve now put together a list of talks (to be given at the BUCLD this weekend) that look to have something to do with syntax. You can get it using the link below.

BUCLD 35 syntax talks (use the same password as for homework keys)

As I mentioned in class, I have decided to add an “extra-credit” component to the BUCLD this year, if you’re going to be there. It works as follows: If you go to two talks and write up a short summary of each (between a half-page and a page for each, single-spaced), I will add this into your homework score. The summaries should contain what you took to be their point, what their argument seemed to be, and comments on anything you didn’t understand or didn’t agree with. If you do just one, I’ll figure out some way to count as being something like a “half-homework”-worth of extra credit.

If you can’t go to the conference for any reason, there will be one further opportunity for extra credit later in the semester, which fills the same “extra credit slot” as this one, so you won’t be losing the opportunity for extra credit by not attending the conference—but I encourage you to go, it’s an interesting event.

HW 6 posted, schedule updated

Ok, it took me a little bit longer than I anticipated it would, but I’ve now linked Homework #6 into the schedule.

As mentioned in class, this was assigned a bit prematurely—I violated my rule of making the homework depend only on the classes that happen up to the one in which it was given out; this homework relies almost entirely on what we’re going to cover on Tuesday. The good news, though, is that it’s a pretty short assignment.