“Inflected”

It has come to my attention that the term “inflected” may not be familiar to some of you, so let me just outline what “inflected” is supposed to refer to.

The term “inflected” here means basically “with a tense/agreement ending.” Adults use inflected verbs generally, except in the infinitive (where there is no tense or agreement—that’s basically what “infinitive” is supposed to indicate). So, agreement refers to subject agreement, the ending on the verb that goes with the person/number/gender of the subject. In English, these endings are not very elaborate—almost all agreement endings in English are silent (which is written as -∅, “zero”, no pronunciation). (Other languages often have more tense/agreement morphology on the verbs.)

  • I go
  • we go
  • you go
  • they go
  • he goes
  • she goes
  • it goes

It is only with third person singular subjects that you see a mark on the verb indicating agreement with the subject: That is the “-s”. So, it is really only those verbs with a visible ending that we could certainly class as inflected.

An uninflected form, then, is one that is missing the ending—and in the experiment outlined in the homework, errors arising from using a verb that should have had an ending but from which the ending is missing are only going to be detectible with a third person singular subject. That would be something like:

  • he go
  • she go
  • it go

Those would count as uninflected forms.

(As an aside, things are a little bit special with the verb bebe shows a little bit more elaborate agreement. With be there are special inflections for first person (“I am”) and third person (“he is”), but 2nd person (you) and all plurals come out the same way (“are”). The uninflected form is “be”.)

All of the examples above are in the present tense. In English it turns out that the only time you can see any subject agreement is in the present tense (except with be—and in the past tense with be you only see number agreement—”was” for singular [except for second person], and “were” for everything else—all plurals and all second persons).

  • I went
  • you went
  • he went
  • they went

The tense marking also counts as inflection, so all of the past tense examples above count as inflected as well. The uninflected form is still “go” or “be”.

HW1: Note about the last question

The last question of the homework refers to a table concerning child utterances containing not, and gives the table in the same form as the others, crossing inflection in the stimulus with inflection in the child’s utterance.

“But wait,” you might say, “you don’t get inflected verbs with not in English. What’s going on?”

Indeed, a verb negated with not in English is not inflected, the inflection is carried on do: He does not go. The trick here is revealed by looking at (8b), which is the stimulus sentence for the inflected-not condition. What the researchers did is put the not in a higher clause: Do you think that he goes, or don’t you think that he goes? So, goes is inflected in the stimulus sentence, as advertised, and children (like adults) interpret this as meaning the same thing as Do you think that he goes, or do you think that he doesn’t go?—and, it seems, answer accordingly.

Office hours change

Due to the fact that I am now teaching Semantics at the time I had previously set for my Wednesday office hours, I need to move them to a different time. Which I hereby do. My new office hours are:

  • Tuesday 11-12
  • Wednesday 12-1
  • Thursday 11-12

However, if none of those are convenient, or indeed if you know in advance that you’d like to meet, I’m happy enough to just schedule a meeting in whatever time we have free in common, which leaves office hours open for walk-ins.

Are these your textbooks?

Somebody in the Semantics class today (Friday) left behind their LX540 textbooks, and I have collected them. Are they yours? Possibly, if (a) you used to have textbooks, (b) you no longer have textbooks, (c) you were kind of in the middle back of the Semantics classroom. Let me know if these conditions describe your situation.

Homework 0

The first “homework” comes in two parts. The first part is just a couple of demographic questions for you. You can email your answers to me. If I did this right, you can click here to start your email with the questions already there. Do this anyway, even if you know that I know you, I might not know all of this stuff. But the questions are:

 

What other Linguistics courses (or related courses) have you taken?

What are your (actual or planned) major/minors?

What languages (other than English) do you know, and how well?

What language(s) did you grow up speaking?

Do you prefer to be called something other than what I see in the class list?1

Anything else that seems relevant?

The second part is to comment on this post. Feel free to just say “present.” But I want you to have had the opportunity to use the comment function, and I want to know that it is working right.


1Within reason, that is. “Your Excellence” is not a valid answer here.