{"id":70,"date":"2009-09-21T03:10:26","date_gmt":"2009-09-21T07:10:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ling.bu.edu\/blogs\/lx522f09\/2009\/09\/21\/what-are-these-symbols\/"},"modified":"2012-11-08T03:10:52","modified_gmt":"2012-11-08T07:10:52","slug":"what-are-these-symbols","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/2009\/09\/21\/what-are-these-symbols\/","title":{"rendered":"What are these *\/?\/*?\/??\/# symbols?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I mentioned this in class or not, but there are a couple of conventional symbols used to indicate the grammatical status of example sentences. I wanted to find this out there somewhere on the web, but my searches didn&#8217;t reveal much. The best I found was <a href=\"http:\/\/everything2.com\/user\/Gritchka\/writeups\/asterisk\">a writeup about &#8220;asterisk&#8221; on everything2.com<\/a> but that doesn&#8217;t seem like a very definitive source.<\/p>\n<p>In any event, the basic distinction is between no marking (grammatical) and being marked with an asterisk or &#8220;star&#8221; (ungrammatical).<\/p>\n<p>However, judgments often do not feel that clear-cut, so this is sometimes expressed with the help of question marks. I have even seen cases of people using more than one star (**), presumably to indicate something like &#8220;gut-wrenching ungrammaticality.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One question mark (?) is &#8220;dubious&#8221; or &#8220;marginal&#8221;, two question marks (??) is worse, a question mark and a star is still worse (?*), but all are better than flat-out ungrammatical (*).<\/p>\n<p>How you actually treat an example with, say, a ?? grammaticality rating winds up depending a bit on what is being discussed. Sometimes people will take ?? examples to be better than you&#8217;d expect, hence something that the grammar should generate, and sometimes people will consider them to be worse than they should be, hence something that the grammar should not generate. It&#8217;s a bit of a grey area.<\/p>\n<p>You might also see the hash mark (#), which is usually used to indicate a sentence that is grammatical in principle, but either nonsensical or inappropriate in a discourse. So, to use a well-worn example (that was also mentioned in class), #My toothbrush is pregnant again. Or, in response to the question &#8220;Who bought the lamp?&#8221; the answer &#8220;#Pat bought THE LAMP&#8221; (an answer that would have been perfectly fine as a response to the question &#8220;What did Pat buy?&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>There is also a notational shorthand that people often use to compare two (or more) sentences, one of which is grammatical and the other of which isn&#8217;t. When a sentence would be rendered ungrammatical by adding a word, the two sentences can be written together with the added word in parentheses (indicating optionality), and with a star inside the parentheses (indicating that if you take the option to add the word, the result is ungrammatical: Pat ate (*quickly) the apple. This is shorthand for the two sentences &#8220;Pat ate the apple&#8221; (grammatical) and &#8220;*Pat ate quickly the apple&#8221; (ungrammatical). A bit weirder is the case where <i>not<\/i> taking the option results in ungrammaticality, which is indicated by a star <i>outside<\/i> the parentheses: Pat ate the *(apple). This is shorthand for &#8220;Pat ate the apple&#8221; (grammatical) and &#8220;*Pat ate the&#8221; (ungrammatical). A simple parenthesized string, without adornment, means that both sentences (with and without the parenthesized material) are grammatical: Pat ate the apple (quickly). I&#8217;ll mention this parenthesis notation in class too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I mentioned this in class or not, but there are a couple of conventional symbols used to indicate the grammatical status of example sentences. I wanted to find this out there somewhere on the web, but my searches didn&#8217;t reveal much. The best I found was a writeup about &#8220;asterisk&#8221; on &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/2009\/09\/21\/what-are-these-symbols\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;What are these *\/?\/*?\/??\/# symbols?&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,7,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-homework-notes","category-readings","category-trivia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":327,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions\/327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-blogs.bu.edu\/lx522f09\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}