Final Exams, Final Thoughts

Your final exams are now graded.  I’ve left them with Liz Politis (621 Commonwealth Ave., #120), along with any uncollected homework assignments.  If you don’t have the time to collect your exam before/during winter break, then you can stop by early next semester. Here are some numbers concerning the class performance on the final exam: …

Continue reading ‘Final Exams, Final Thoughts’ »

Final Office Hours & Final Exam!

I’ll be holding some final office hours next week: Monday December 14, 2-3:30pm Tuesday December 15, 3:30-5pm Feel free to come by with any questions that arise as you study for our final exam. And one last reminder–that final exam will be on Wednesday December 16, 9-11am, in KCB 102 (our usual classroom).

HW10 Answer Key

I’ve posted the HW10 answer key in the password-protected “Readings” section of our course website. (UPDATE: a typo in the aspectual classification of the VP knit a sweater has been corrected) HW10 Distribution (56 points total; 31 assignments submitted) 52-56…..13 47-51…..13 <47…..5

December reading assignments: Kearns and Vendler

The final two reading assignments are listed below: 1.  Kearns 6.2-6.3 (UPDATE:  Having had a closer look at the Kearns readings, I’ve decided that section 6.3 is not necessary.  Most likely, we will not have enough to discuss the topic of that section (the mass/count distinction amongst nouns) .  But you should still read section …

Continue reading ‘December reading assignments: Kearns and Vendler’ »

Reading for Tu 12/1: excerpt fr. D. Dowty “Word Meaning and Montague Grammar” (section 2.2, pgs. 51-71)

For our next class (the Tuesday after Thanksgiving break), please read the excerpt from David Dowty’s Word Meaning and Montague Grammar (section 2.2, pgs. 51-71).  In our final classes, we will look at some issues in the lexical semantics of verbs, adjectives, and nouns.  The Dowty excerpt discusses certain basic distinctions that can be made …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Tu 12/1: excerpt fr. D. Dowty “Word Meaning and Montague Grammar” (section 2.2, pgs. 51-71)’ »