Reading for Tu 4/13: Cruse 1986, Ch. 9

For Tuesday 4/13, please read the following book chapter, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website (PDF format): Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Opposites, Part I: Complementaries and antonyms. From Lexical Semantics (Chapter 9).  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Note: sections 9.1-9.5 are required.  Sections 9.6-9.8 are optional.)

Reading for Th 4/1: Postal 2004

For Thursday 4/1, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website (PDF format:) Postal, Paul. 2004. The structure of one type of American English Vulgar Minimizer. In Skeptical Linguistic Essays (Chap. 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reading for Tu 3/23: Martin & Wolfram 1998

For Tuesday 3/23, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website (PDF format): Martin, Stefan and Walt Wolfram. 1998. The sentence in African-American Vernacular English. In African-American English: Structure, history, and use, S. Mufwene et al. (eds), 11-36. London: Routledge. Pay particular attention to the discussion of …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Tu 3/23: Martin & Wolfram 1998’ »

Reading for Tu 3/2: Ladusaw 1980, Fauconnier 1978

For next Tuesday, please read the following papers, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” sections of this website: 1. Ladusaw, W. (1980) “On the notion ‘affective’ in the analysis of negative-polarity items” (pages 1-7) 2. Fauconnier, G. (1978) “Implication reversal in a natural language” (pages 289-295; those of you who have taken Semantics 1 …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Tu 3/2: Ladusaw 1980, Fauconnier 1978’ »

Reading for Th 2/18: Zwicky & Pullum 1983

For next Thursday, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website: Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t. Language 59: 502-513. In the paper, Zwicky and Pullum ask whether n’t should really be considered a contracted form of not (as ‘ve …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Th 2/18: Zwicky & Pullum 1983’ »

Reading for Tu 2/9, Th 2/11: Zanuttini 1994

For next week, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website: Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1994. Re-examining negative clauses. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, G. Cinque et al. (eds), 427-451. Georgetown University Press. Most likely, we will not get to the reading until Thursday 2/11.  Tuesday’s …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Tu 2/9, Th 2/11: Zanuttini 1994’ »

Reading for Thursday 2/4: Potsdam 1997

For Thursday 2/4, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website (PDF format): Potsdam, Eric. 1997. NegP and subjunctive complements in English. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 533-541. The Potsdam paper provides an empirical argument for the syntactic structure of the English clause/standard negation that we will develop in …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Thursday 2/4: Potsdam 1997’ »

Reading for Thursday 1/28: Dryer 1989

For Thursday 1/28, please read the following paper, which can be downloaded from the “Readings” section of this website (PDF format): Dryer, Matthew. 1989. Universals of negative position. In Studies in Syntactic Typology, M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, and J. Wirth (eds), 93-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Remember that the password for the “Readings” section is listed on …

Continue reading ‘Reading for Thursday 1/28: Dryer 1989’ »